PROTOCOL FOR
POST STRENGTH TESTS
I. Test
Questions
Part A. Post
& Core Buildup Testing
How do different non-metal esthetic posts compare in
strength to each other and to carbon fiber, stainless steel, and titanium
posts?
Part B. Post
Strength Test and Fatigue Cycling
Does fatigue cycling decrease the strength of
different non-metal esthetic posts?
II. Test
Products
1. Post Type Brand
(Size) Manufacturer
Light Cure Core Paste / no
post (Control)............Core
Paste ......................... DenMat
Carbon fiber post................................................ GF
(x)................................. J.Morita
Stainless steel....................................................... Parapost
XP ..................... Whaledent
Titanium (99% pure)............................................ Parapost
XP ...................... Whaeldent
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. C-1
White Post................... Parkell
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. D.T.
Lightpost..................... Bisco
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. FiberKor
Post .................... Pentron
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. FRC
Postec ....................... Ivoclar
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. GF
..................................... J.
Morita
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. Glass
Fibre Post.................. Ellman
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. Luscent
Anchors ................ Dentatus
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. Mirafit
White....................... Hagar
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. Parapost
Fiber White.......... Whaledent
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. Snowpost
..........................
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. Twin
Luscent Anchors ....... Dentatus
Glass Fiber Post.................................................. Snowlight...........................
Zircon-dioxide ceramic........................................ Cosmopost.........................Ivoclar
Zircon-dioxide ceramic........................................ Cerapost
............................Brassler
2. Teeth
90 extracted human maxillary cuspids.
3. Equipment & Materials needed
5 mm circular molds
Air / water syringe
Bowls
Calipers
Centrix syringes
Core Paste kit
Diamond rotary instruments #1116.8c
Drills associated w/ each post systems
Explorers (several of misc. sizes)
High speed drill (1)
Kimwipes
Panavia F 2.0 kits (2)
Paper points (various sizes)
Sandblaster
Slow speed drills
Slow speed saw
Snap resin
Syringe gun
Thermocycler
Timers (3)
Waterbath 37°C
III. Test Method
Part A. Post
& Core Buildup Testing
1. Select 90 extracted human maxillary cuspids based on
dimensional requirements (Root length measured from facial CEJ= 15-25 mm /
facial CEJ diameter = 6.0 - 7.5 mm) and lack of decay, fractures, large cracks,
abrasions and/or restorations. During all steps teeth must remain wet in tap water.
2. Prepare Teeth.
a. Cut off the tooth crown at
the facial surface CEJ using a diamond saw creating a flat surface
perpendicular to the tooth root. This results in a root length of approximately
15-25 mm and a cut CEJ surface diameter that is apx 6.0-7.5 mm.
b. Prepare a consistent size
root canal using conventional step back method. Remove the least amount of
dentin as possible.
c. Fill root canal completely
with gutta percha.
d. Store prepared samples in
refrigerated tap water for testing.
3. Embed prepared teeth to a level 2 mm
below the facial CEJ in resin (Snap-Parkell).
4. Construct 5 samples for each
post material type.
a. Cut posts to 13 mm in
length.
b. Prepare posts as instructed
by manufacturer (see appendix).
c. Drill post hole using appropriate drills to receive a post approximately 1.25-1.35 mm diameter (depending on the post) that are to be placed
9 mm deep into the root.
d. No pins or potholes will be
placed.
e. Thoroughly rinse the post
hole with water and dry with paper points.
f.
Set the post with Panavia F 2.0 as directed by instructions (see appendix) to a depth
of 9 mm leaving 4 mm of the post extended above the CEJ.
g. Place mold over tooth and center over post. Syringe Core Paste into mold and pack.
Fill mold to the top.
h. Light cure Core Paste for 40 seconds and then remove
mold from the Core Paste.

Figure 1. Cross section view of constructed
sample.
5. Stress Samples.
a. Store samples in 37 °C waterbath for 30 to 60 minutes.
b. Transfer samples to thermocycler.
c. Thermocycle samples 2000
cycles between 5°C and 55°C distilled water (dwell time = 15 sec,
transfer time = 10 sec, total apx. time = 35 hours).
6. Break Samples.
a. Remove samples from thermocycler after thermocycling and store in room temperature tap water until tested. Break all samples as described below in the
same order as they were built.
b. Using a slow speed diamond saw,
carefully remove Core Paste until the coronal aspect of the post is visible.
c. Using a rotary diamond in a handpiece, carefully remove core buildup material at a 45° angle to the
lingual/occlusal aspect so the breaking probe can be placed directly on the edge of the
post and there is a flat surface to apply the breaking force. (See Figure 2.)
![]()

Figure
2. View of final ground sample
d. Place sample in test
jig and align sample so the post is centered under the ball probe so the ball probe can apply
pressure as close to the end of the post as possible.
e. Apply a load on the lingual
side of the sample centered on the 45° angled surface using a
crosshead speed of 1.00 mm/min until sample reaches ultimate failure. (See
Figure 3.)
f.
Record any intermediary breaks that may occur during ramping.
g. Record modes of failure
and maximum load that was applied at that failure.
h. Record maximum load
exerted on sample.

Figure 3. MTS setup for Compression Test of Post Reinforced Tooth
Part B. Strength
Tests and Fatigue Cycling
1. Construct 10 samples for
each post material type.
a. Prepare posts as instructed
by manufacturer.
b. Set the post with Snap resin
to the full length of the post leaving at least 3 mm of the post extended above
the methacrylate surface.
c. Using a slow speed saw, cut
the post so 3 mm extends from the surface of the methacrylate. Verify and
record final length of the extend post. (See Figure 4.)

Figure 4. View of
sample for fatigue test
2. Break 5 baseline control
samples for each brand of post.
a. Test 5 posts of each
brand, which will act as baseline controls, by applying a load on the end of
the post at a 45° angle to the long axis using a crosshead
speed of 1.00 mm/min, until the sample reaches ultimate failure. (See Figure 5.)

Figure 5. MTS setup for Fatigue Cycling and Strength Testing of Post
b. Record any intermediary
breaks that may occur during ramping.
c. Record the modes of failure
and the maximum load that was applied at that failure.
d. Record the yield force that
results from each sample.
3. Fatigue and break 5 samples for
each brand of post.
a. Fatigue 5 samples for each
material type 15,000 cycles using an alternating load of 5-50 N at 1.4 Hz.
b. Break samples as described
in Part B.2. above for all fatigued samples.
4. Compare the mean baseline strength value to its mean fatigued strength value for each post brand.
Appendix: Panavia F 2.0 Instructions
1. Rinse and clean canal using
air/water spray.
2. Dry canal with paperpoint.
3. Dispense 1 drop each of ED Primer
A and B, mix 3-5 seconds, and place on any coronal dentin and into canal.
4. After 30 seconds, evaporate
volatiles using an airwater syringe and remove excess with paperpoint.
5. Mix Panavia F 2.0 paste for
20-30 seconds. (Leave spread thin until ready to use.)
6. Load mixed paste into
Centrix syringe.
7. Inject Panavia F 2.0 into
canal.
8. Set the post and apply
pressure for 20 sec.
9. Lightly air thin Panavia
over whole dentin bonding surface.
10. Light Cure Panavia F 2.0 for 20
seconds using Optilux 500 halogen curing light (11 mm tip, 725 mW/cm2)